Ten mentors, ten opinions, one cohort with eight weeks left.
A program's hardest weeks are the ones where a founder has to pivot and every mentor points somewhere different. A shared, cited scoring formula turns that from a seniority contest into a comparison: the same four pillars applied to the current idea and to the alternatives, with the evidence behind each open in a tab the founder can read tonight.
One formula across every cohort company makes screening and demo-day readiness comparable instead of anecdotal.
Founders can submit their own idea and have it scored on the same basis — a neutral second opinion no mentor has to deliver personally.
Cited evidence gives a pivoting team something to read in week three, when there is no time left for a month of customer discovery.
The boards accelerators and incubators watch
Live free-tier snapshots from mission-led sectors that fill a lot of program applications.
Education
Live board- 2540Grade Integrity & Inflation Analytics for Higher Ed
- 2640Collaborative Project Matchmaker for Personalized Learning
- 2736CrosswordCraft: AI Educational Puzzle Maker
- 2835Federated Student Success Early-Warning Network for Multi-Campus Colleges
- 2934IEP Goal Coach for Special Education Progress Monitoring
Climate & Sustainability
Live boardHealthcare
Live board- 4236MedExplain: AI-Generated Personalized Patient Education
- 4336TriageAssist – AI-Powered Real-Time Triage Decision Support
- 4435ReguAI: Post-Market AI Monitoring for Medical Devices
- 4534ConsentAI – Personalized AI-Generated Surgical Consent Forms
- 4634CompSOP AI: AI-Powered QMS & SOP Management for Life Sciences Startups
Free-tier snapshot — the full boards, analysis and score history are one free sign-up away.
Start free, upgrade when it pays for itself
Pro spans twelve domains with deep-research reports — one standing research function shared across an entire batch's worth of markets.
Frequently asked questions
How does a program use this during selection?
Applicant ideas can be scored on the same four pillars and sixteen dimensions as everything on the boards, which makes a batch of applications comparable on market evidence rather than on pitch quality. It complements a selection process rather than replacing the human judgement in it.
What does it add during the program itself?
Mostly speed for pivots. A team that needs a new direction in week three cannot run a month of discovery; a domain board plus its cited evidence gives them a shortlist of adjacent, already-sourced problems and a defensible reason for choosing among them.
Won't founders just chase the highest-scoring opportunity?
The boards rank opportunities, not companies — execution, distribution and founder-market fit still decide outcomes, and none of them are in the formula. The score's job is to stop a team spending eight weeks on a problem with no cited demand, not to pick their company for them.
Do you provide seats for a whole cohort?
Accounts are individual today — each founder or program staffer needs their own plan. There is no cohort seat bundle, so plan for per-person accounts.
Can mentors verify the evidence rather than trust the score?
That is the design. Every dimension records the citations that lifted it and the cap that fired when it had none, so a mentor who disagrees with a score can go straight to the underlying sources and argue with those instead.
More general questions are answered on the FAQ page.
Evidence first. Then conviction.
Free to start — no credit card required.
Also built for indie hackers, product managers, agencies, investors, startup founders, venture studios, corporate innovation teams, fractional ctos, ai & ml engineers, micro-saas operators, product designers, growth marketers, non-technical domain experts, angel investors, no-code builders and students & career switchers.